Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/April/12

April 12

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Article-single-stub
No category, no sign it's ever been used, and it's been here for two years. Redundant to the many stub types for songs and singles, not needed. Grutness...wha?  13:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Bob • (talk) • 18:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Bosniak-bio-stub
Unproposed, no category, and no sign it's ever been used. Another example of splitting by an aspirant nation/unrecognised country/sub-national ethnic group/choose your own definition. Neither useful nor helpful for stub-splitting - delete. 13:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per anonymous proposer. Waacstats (talk) 08:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 'twas I. Must've accidentally hit a fifth tilde. Grutness...wha?  01:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.