Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/August/10

Conspiracy-stub / / (redirect con-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete On the discovery list from over a year ago where the decision (not acted on at the time) was "send to sfd", but whether it was or not, in fifteen months it has gained ten stubs. At that rate it will take over six years to come close to threshold. Upmerge or (preferably) delete, whichever is seen as more appropriate. And definitely delete the ambiguously named redirect! Grutness...wha?  01:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Con-Stub misleading redirect. --frogger3140 (talk) 23:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Moomin-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deleted

Sad to say this (I like the moomins, and was even once lead singer in a band called The Moomins !) but this unproposed type is totally unnecessary and will never get close to threshold. The associated permcat (of which this parentless stub category is not a subcategory) is actually called, but only has 43 articles in total. Delete. Grutness...wha?  01:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I was unaware that one had to propose stubs before creating them. I am sorry. 20I.170.20 (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom (I even like the moomins too!). - Icewedge (talk) 06:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * But wait, given the fact that 20I.170.20 has gone back and removed the template from the articles s/he tagged with it I will take the above comment as a deletion request. Tagged for CSD G7. - Icewedge (talk) 06:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.