Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/August/30

Catalonia-hist-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed, unused, and - given that Catalonia is not a nation in the generally accepted sense of the word, contrary to stub-splitting practice. Neither nor  is overburdened size-wise, and neither give any indication that this new stub type would reach threshold. Delete as first option, upmerge to as a grudging second. Grutness...wha?  07:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete It doesn't add anything. We shouldn't created stub types for new nations until they are recognised by United Nations. And it's empty. --Jaimevelasco (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That's not the standard used. This is not a stub type for a "new nation", to start with - it's a stub type for a region which crosses national boundaries, and each of those nations has its own stub type. The point is that stub types are split by the currently-official national and sub-national boundaries, and history stubs are rarely if ever split into sub-[national regions until such time as the national history stub categories desperately need splitting - i.e., they have over 800 stubs that cannot be split in other ways. Currently, does not even have a quarter of that number. In any case, recognition by the UN is not a prerequisite for stub-splitting. Grutness...wha?  09:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.