Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/February/29

February 29

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was renamed to non-stub name, redirect deleted

Church-directory-stub/ redlink/ Church-directory-dev
This one's a really strange one. unproposed, and - according to its text - for lists "of Christian church bodies or Christian denominations (not Church buildings)". All articles on these subjects are currently well-covered by other stub types. Lists aren't, because - by definition - lists aren't stubs (they usually get listdev rather than stub templates). There is, of course, no permanent parent - instead, there's an equally strange, which is heading to WP:CFD in a moment or two. Delete as unsalvageable. Grutness...wha?  00:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Say a prayer for it before burying it. Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP - I have changed the name (Template:Church-directory-dev)and format to reflect the listdev template as stated above. This template is need so folks understand it is a directory of Christian church bodies or Christian denominations-- not church buildings). --Carlaude (talk) 04:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * We still need to delete the redirect left behind by the move, but since the creator agrees and has depopulated the old name, this should be speediable hopefully. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Close enough for jazz. Thanks Carlaude. Grutness...wha?  23:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.