Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/January/15

January 15

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

UK-suffragan bishop-stub
Unproposed. Not convinced this is needed, but even if it is, a rename to standard stub naming conventions is needed - without keeping the current name as a redirect. At least it's upmerged. Grutness...wha?  01:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem a logical split to me, as against the existing subdivisions by geography and denomination. Delete.  Alai (talk) 23:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Côte d'Ivoire biography stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to Ivorian people stubs, per recent permcat changes


 * Moved from WP:CFD
 * Propose renaming Category:Côte d'Ivoire biography stubs to Category:Côte d'Ivoire people stubs
 * Nominator's rationale:


 * You misread WP:SFD, it seems. Mot that it would make too much difference in this case, except that here it's a speedy rename. Grutness...wha?  00:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just noticed that this wouldn't be the correct name anyway - all othe people stub categories use the adjectival form, so it should be . Grutness...wha?  07:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just following the category names already in existence when I created it, I.E. instead of . We should rename all of these while we are at it.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That hierarchy seems to use the form pretty consistently, so we can't really do that off the cuff.  If we're not going to follow the permcats, it's over to CFR...  Alai (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.