Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/January/6

January 6

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was '''Delete. Another month and a half and it had only gained two more articles, one of which wasn't a stub'''

Youngstown-stub /
Delete Listed at Discoveries since June. Only 3 stubs and at minimum needs a rename since Youngstown is a disambiguation page. It does have an associated Wikiproject, but 3 stubs in over 6 months is hardly evidence of a need. Given that we've been splitting up Ohio by county for the geo and school stubs, suggest that if this stub is kept it be renamed to MahoningOH-stub after the county Youngstown, Ohio is in. Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't think we really need to consider splitting general stubs by county yet (given the size of ot'll be quite a long while...), and three stubs ain't gonna cut it otherwise. Grutness...wha?  23:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Why do people think adding a category to a stub type up for deletion will help? If it survives, the cat will be added, and if it doesn't then it's extra work to delete it. Caerwine Caer’s whines  03:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.