Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/January/7

January 7

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was '''delete. No longer used by either WPSS or the Sailor Moon project'''

Sailor-Moon-stub
Noticed this one while seeing the latest additions to TfD (one of which is a related template). Seems to be completely unused, and misnamed (it's not a subtype of Moon-stub!). No opinion either way as to whether it should be renamed or outright deleted (it is connected with a WikiProject, though that doesn't seem to be using it), but one of the two needs to happen. If it can be shown to be useful and populated, rename to SailorMoon-stub, per WP:WSS/NG; if not delete it and its associated category. Grutness...wha?  00:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as no longer needed. Someone upgraded all the remaining Sailor Moon stubs to start-class today, and we're unlikely to create anything new unless it's at least that big. If you keep these things for historical reasons, though, you should know this has seen a lot of use in the past. --Masamage ♫ 01:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not likely to see use unless another series (either manga or anime) is released and not in use now. Caerwine Caer’s whines  02:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dprk-footy-bio-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to NorthKorea-footy-bio-stub and upmerge

Unproposed, and in serious need of work. Firstly, there's no such thing as a Dprk. There is a DPRK, mind you - it's known as North Korea, a term used as standard on stub templates. As such, if this is kept, then it should be renamed to NorthKorea-footy-bio-stub. If kept, this will also need a stub category - this one feeds directly into a little-used permcat (only eleven articles, which is pretty weird considering that NK has been a reasonably strong soccer nation over the years).

On many things relating to N&S Korea we use one stub type for both - and Korea-footy-bio-stub and its category are hardly overextended (150 or so stubs). Upmerging seems a sensible option Rename/upmerge (and don't keep this non-standard name as a redirect). Grutness...wha?  00:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, rename I created the template and yeah, it should be moved (I admit, not the best name choice). The problem is that all of the N. Korea footballers were put in the same category with South Korean footballers, which is definitely wrong, seeing as they play for two different states. The so-called permcat is not little-used, though. The problem is that information on North Korean football is very limited, putting it mildly, so I'll gladly believe that wikipedia has only 11 articles on North Korean footballers. Oh, and thanks for informing me of the nomination Grutness! Ban  Ray  01:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Rename and upmerge until reaching the usual 60, but considering the disparity in numbers here, it would be well worth creating a SouthKorea-footy-bio-stub and giving it a category as a way of separating the two Koreas. Caerwine Caer’s whines 02:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename/upmerge, or else delete, don't much care which. But strong remove permcat from the stub template, if it's kept in any form whatsoever.  A SouthKorea- template sounds like a good idea, regardless of how the categories are lumped or split.  Alai (talk) 03:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Korean one. Matthew_hk   t  c  15:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.