Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/March/3

Naruto-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Seems to be a mostly unused stub-type (only 2 pages in the category. Vivio Testa rossa   Talk Who 05:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Only one, actually - the other item in the category is the template. At the very least upmerging seems to be in order, though I doubt too many tears would be shed at an outright deletion, either. Grutness...wha?  23:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Use the delete jutsu on it. I just searched through the entirety of  and its subcategories and found all of one other article (Naruto: Path of the Ninja) that would warrant having this stub type if it were kept.  Even if it were to have a WikiProject of its own, which it does not, it's way too small. Caerwine Caer’s whines  23:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't have much use. I'm sure there is a guideline that says you need to use it on more than one article. Branson03 (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:STUB says its a minimum of 60. Branson03 (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a minimum of 60 for a separate stub category - there isn't really a minimum for an upmerged template, though this one seems to be too little-used to be useful. Grutness...wha?  23:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.