Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/May/17

Taiwan-university-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge

Per Dec 2007 Discoveries, has never held more than 35 articles. Upmerge. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 04:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per nom. Grutness...wha?  21:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per nom. VegaDark (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

un-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Per Dec 2007 Discoveries,a misformed redirect to UN-stub. Delete. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 04:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and naming conventions. Grutness...wha?  21:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. VegaDark (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Grutness DA PIE EATER (talk) 01:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

nano-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename and upmerge - don't keep current template name as a redirect

From last year's Discoveries; per Grutness I suggest we rename nano-tech-stub and upmerge, as it has a small population. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 03:41, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename/Upmerge per nom (and my original suggestion). Grutness...wha?  21:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Rename/upmerge per nom.. VegaDark (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.