Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/May/21

Battletech-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed and undersized; no project or portal. Has been lingering on Discoveries since March 2007, so I propose we delete.
 * This has been a Pegship nomination! :) Delete per nom. Grutness...wha?  01:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

UK-explorer-stub (no cat)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was populated; create category

Linked only to WPSS discussions; has 318 articles, so not really due for splitting yet. and its sub-cats have 312 articles, but only 16 of those qualify as stubs. I suggest we delete or upmerge this one. Previous discussion is here, but it mostly centered around the UK-vs-British naming thing. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 20:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Upmerge We have other country-explorer-stub templates, so I see no problem with an upmerged template that has 16 candidates already identified as suitable for tagging with. Caerwine Caer’s whines  22:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per CW. Grutness...wha?  01:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Upto 56 propose we create a category (especially if anyone can find the missing 4) otherwise upmerge. Waacstats (talk) 13:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy enough with that - 56 is pretty damn close. Grutness...wha?  00:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, but then we're back to the original snag -- what to call the category. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 15:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * On the basis of it is easier to ask forgiveness than dither endlessly, I went ahead and turned the red link of a category into a blue link. Caerwine Caer’s whines 17:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lingayat-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge

Undersized and unproposed; another one from March 2007 Discoveries. Upmerge to .Her Pegship  (tis herself) 20:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Upmerge at a minimum; deletion isn't out of the question, either. Grutness...wha?  01:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Business-school-stub (upmerged)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Don't know how useful this one is; previous discussion is here. I would rather delete, but if we keep it it should be renamed. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 20:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree that if kept renaming would be a good idea, since -school-stub indicates secondary or primary education. Virtually unused in over a year. Grutness...wha?  01:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.