Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/May/30


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was '''upmerge. Any proposed renaming of other categories should be handled separately'''

Lightly populated but potentially useful. The template is OK but I suggest we rename the cat to to conform to other sub-cats in the Euro-u-stub category.Her Pegship  (tis herself)  21:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I recommend upmerger on size, for now, and renaming of, , to conform to English language.  And likewise with this cat, if it's kept, or subsequently recreated.  Will tag those in.  Alai (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Upmerge this. Also, given that the parent permcat uses the "X in Foo" form, which we regularly format as "Foo X stubs" for the purposes of stub category naming, I would oppose Alai's proposed renamings of the other similar categories he mentioned. Grutness...wha?  00:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * What we are is regularly inconsistent (with each other, as well as with usage found in the linguistic wild, and text-book grammar). But note the present location of the majority of the children of, for example, from  to .  Alai (talk) 08:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

NEURO-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete, possibly consider splitting out a neurology-stub later Seems like a duplicate of Neuroscience-stub, set up erroneously as an attempt to create a WikiProject Stub-Class template if the category assignment is anything to go by (something which is handled via talk page banner templates). As such, it is both redundant and poorly named as a stub template and malformed as a Stub-Class template. In either case, it needs deletion. Grutness...wha?  02:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Delete - I created it originally as a method of stub-sorting for WikiProject Neurology (which incidently is not a duplicate of Neuroscience) however, with the creation of a banner with sorting parser functions, it's now no longer needed. Regards, CycloneNimrod Talk? 15:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I worded that poorly, apologies. i did not mean to imply that neurology and neuroscience were the same things (my former neuropsych lecturers would not have been impressed!), rather that, for the purposes of stub sorting, they cover so much of the same territory that it is unnecessary to have both as separate templates. Grutness...wha?  03:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Mind you, we might end up having to split those sooner or later, so perhaps we might move this to neurology-stub (or else create such fresh), upmerged to the same category. Alai (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I recommend speedy deletion as creator is okay with deletion.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.