Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/October/19


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge to Category:Prehistoric reptile stubs

After going through the first two levels of parent categories ( and ), I have only found 13 stubs for this category. I think we should upmerge it. While there may be a few higher up in the stub category tree, I find it unlikely that there is a significant number of them. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll have a look through, buyt if it doesn't get much further then , yes, upmerging looks the best option. Grutness...wha?  21:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahhh - skip that, even if everything in that category and its subcat were a stub it still wouldn't get near threshold, so upmerge is best. Grutness...wha?  21:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I went through that, and even including ichthyopterygia (which is a questionable inclusion, perhaps) it only got to about 22 stubs. Grutness...wha?  21:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Upmerge and note under "it seemed a good idea at the time"; this was proposed during a discussion of dinosaur- and paleo-stubs back in 2006. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 22:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.