Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/October/3

New dam stub categories

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename all

for some reason, we didn't finalise the naming of the new categories for dams, and as such the naming's gone a little awry. we have: Unfortunately, the permcat is simply, so these should really be Rename all. Grutness...wha?  00:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * , and
 * , and
 * , and
 * , and
 * , and
 * respectively.
 * , and
 * respectively.
 * respectively.
 * Support. Also, shouldn't the templates simply be at dam-stub, etc, given that equally, the article's at dam?  (Feel free to keep redirects if those are felt to be useful.)  Alai (talk) 01:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thrown off guard by the system for bridges. Bridge-struct-stub etc and bridge building and structure stubs. I guess this was only to avoid being confused with the game bridge.  The Bald One       White cat 16:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed so. Church-stub and its ilk may have been a better style to use. I support Alai's idea of moving the templates and keeping the current names as redirects, BTW - I wondered about that at the time but thought the categories were the more obvious thing to fix. Grutness...wha?  23:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Arguably the bridge-structs should likewise be at bridge-stub, on the basis that the article bridge is about those, with just a hatnote on the game, so it has a decent claim to be the primary sense. Probably be more trouble than it's worth to change that one at this stage, though.  Alai (talk) 11:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.