Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/October/6

DeanofExeter-stub and DeanofManchester-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Two new unproposed templates, both upmerged into, of all places. No need for either of these - and  have fewer than 20 articles between them, and  is nowhere near there being a need to consider a split. Seems unlikely to be useful, especially since several of the articles which could use these are more effectively covered by UK-bishop-stub. Grutness...wha?  00:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is likely to be more confusing than useful, especially if it's applied -- as at present -- to people more notable for being bishops, as Grutness points out, or naturalists, etc.  If there's a missing slot in the already-extensive clerical stub hierarchy it would be be for UK-Anglican-clergy-stubs, but even that might be a solution looking for a problem at present.  Alai (talk) 02:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as below the normal thresholds with no hope of reaching same. - Dravecky (talk) 03:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.