Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/September/18


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep per wpss/p discussion

After my spelling problems on proposals I discovered I had an even bigger problem, the Italians only had 40 odd articles and It should have been Japanese category that got created. Can someone please delete this undersized category. does speedy request by only editor work here? Waacstats (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes it does, but it's worth having a hunt around for the other 20 first. I've added a couple of other articles to the category, and can probably find a few more... Grutness...wha?  00:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There were quite a few tiny unstubbed articles in - I've got the stub cat up to 57 articles now, which is probably close enough to 60 to keep it. Grutness...wha?  00:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thankyou, hopefully I am over my holiday and back to normal. Waacstats (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh. Sounds like you need a holiday to recover from the holiday! :) Grutness...wha?  00:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Holiday did include an icosathlon so I shouldn't be surprised. Waacstats (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yikes! And you call that a holiday??? Grutness...wha?  01:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That explains much of Waacs' expertise in so many sport categories...Keep both the category and Waacstats! Her Pegship  (tis herself) 04:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.