Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/September/21

-

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep WA, del ME

We had a discussion back on 23 June as to what to do with the first of these (outcome - add explanatary note) - We now have the former as a subcat to the latter and some as subcats to both others to just the latter the same with templates. I have no preference to which one we keep the former fits better with what we have done with other footy cats, while the latter fits better with what we do everywhere else. delete either category (but not both).Waacstats (talk) 18:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Question - what do we do with Australia's equivalent? Do we use FIFA's classification (Asia), or the usual UN designation (Oceania)? That might give us a clue which to use on the nominated categories. Grutness...wha?  22:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The haphazard organization of these two cats is due to my trying to make sense of who was a member of which league...please deal with it as you see fit!  Her Pegship  (tis herself) 04:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Let's keep the West Asian one, and delete the MidEast(TM) one. The governing body is the West Asian Football Federation, and I'd personally favour using the UN geoscheme whenever possible, as otherwise these regional designations tend to be very sketchily or ambiguously defined.  Alai (talk) 01:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.