Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/September/6

Superfund-stub (redlinked)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete; not linked to any articles

Unproposed, and hardly needed - there is no parent permcat, and the one article which used this template was more-effectively covered by other stub types. Delete. Grutness...wha?  00:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Seems to be a stub type that has limited to no use within Wikipedia. Delete. Jh fireboy  Talk  19:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I created this stub type because there are hundreds of Superfund sites, most of which don't have Wikipedia articles but which could easily support them. I wasn't aware that it was necessary to get advance permission to create stub types, and it seems to violate the spirit of WP:BURO to require this. *** Crotalus *** 01:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It may seem overly-bureaucratic, but there are good reasons for this - have a read of User:Grutness/Stub rationales. Grutness...wha?  23:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete until there are 60+ existing stub articles, per guidelines. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 14:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. If a flood of these is imminent, it would perhaps be useful to have a discussion on the most useful way to scope a suitable stub type.  Alai (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.