Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/August/14

& 2010s-fantasy-novel-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Keep template, upmerge category for now.

&mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Our first 2010 category and template? may be worth keeping the template as we are only 4/5months away but category is alittle short of 60. Waacstats (talk) 10:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Unsurprisingly. Upmerge per nom. Grutness...wha?  23:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

2000s-sf-film-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was '''Keep template, upmerge category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)'''

Has been listed on Discoveries for almost 2 years and has only 10 articels. Waacstats (talk) 10:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Upmerge unless it can be brought up to threshold. template seems useful, just not heavily used. Grutness...wha?  23:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.