Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/August/19

Balearics-geo-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep

Unused. Redundant to Balearics-stub? PC78 (talk) 10:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong (possibly speedy) keep. It's definitely not redundant to Balearics-stub - everywhere which has a standard stub also has a geo-stub. Also, when last checked, this had over 40 articles. Someone appears to have removed it from all the articles which were using it. I've started to repopulate it. Grutness...wha?  00:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Balearics-geo-stub is back on the 51 geographical stubs it should have been on, leaving the plain Balearics-stub on the remaining 12 articles in the category. Grutness...wha?  01:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * A -geo-stub is different to -stub if we delete this geo stub the articles would require a balearics-stub and a spain-geo-stub, much simpler to have one template. so Keep. Waacstats (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - even if unused, it's a template for a likely intersection of 2 parent stub categories. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Given that we don't split people by subnational entity, and that this is a stub category without a template and the fact that it is likely to cause disruption I propose this be deleted. Waacstats (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Grutness...wha?  00:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * merge to Category:Bosniaks and rename Category:Bosniaks to Category:Bosniak people per Category:People by ethnicity PRODUCER (talk) 23:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That won't work - this is a stubcat - you can't merge them with permcats. As for the renaming of the permcat, that's a matter for WP:CFD, not here. Grutness...wha?  00:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * FWIW, a high proportion (about 40%) of the articles marked with this category aren't stubs anyway. Grutness...wha? 
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

\ Livonia-bio-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Used on only 1 article, we don't split by subnational entity and we have other template that can cover this person therefore I propose this be deleted. Waacstats (talk) 08:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Grutness...wha?  00:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.