Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/August/24

&rarr;

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was renamed in accordance with change of permcat at WP:CFD, and with support of string

Rename pending outcome of related CFR nomination, per more correct naming and discussions at WP:WPNZ. Grutness...wha?  23:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * String support assuming the rename nomination for passes. Should be part of that nomination, in my opinion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Rename inline with outcome of CFD i.e change to whatever CFD decides to use. Waacstats (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Note - the relevant CFD has been closed as rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Diving-bio-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was '''kept. –xenotalk 03:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)'''

Not used and already mark as deprecated. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - deprecated stub types are frequently kept to stop "redlink syndrome" from people who add stubs without checking what their edits have actually done. This one is used fairly regularly and cleared manually every time (as are similar types like Football-stub and China-geo-stub). Grutness...wha?  22:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - for reasons stated above. Borgarde (talk) 06:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.