Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/December/14


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete'''. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)'''

Stub category that seems oddly named (language instead of nationality), not big enough, and it is used directly on articles and not with a template. I wouldn't be objecting to a template named Cambodia-singer-stub which feeds into and, which can be split into its own category later if it ever becomes big enough, but even then it should be located at .Borgarde (talk) 07:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, and create an upmerged Cambodia-singer-stub template per nom. Splitting singers by language is a very bad precedent (lots of singers sing in more than one language, and all other occupation categories are by nationality), and creating a manually-sorted stub category is also a no-no. Grutness...wha?  23:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the stub category and create a Cambodia-singer-stub that feeds into the stub categories mentioned by the nominator – per all of the above, and because there simply aren't enough stubs in this category to justify its separation from the parent stub categories. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Since this discussion has gone on for nearly 10 days with no objection I have created the upmerged template and the category is simple waiting to be deleted. Borgarde (talk) 01:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.