Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/December/22

India-squash-bio-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Nomination withdrawn. Nominator has registered a "keep" comment later in the thread, and there have been no comments in favor of deletion. RL0919 (talk) 19:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Should not have existed, article should use Template:Squash-bio-stub instead. Arteyu ? Blame it on me !  08:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What's the problem? This is how stub sorting works, see WP:WSS for more information. Note this template also sorts the article into . Borgarde (talk) 11:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

*Moved from TFD to SFD as the more appropriate venue, duplicating comments originally made at Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 22. By moving this discussion, I am not taking a position for or against the deletion of this stub type. --RL0919 (talk) 15:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no problem with this template. It's upmerged to two parents as there are not yet sufficient stubs for a separate category, but it makes perfect sense to use this template rather than the more general one. Grutness...wha?  01:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Yes, but it covers not more than 10 articles. If one created India-squash-bio-stub, he should create England-squash-bio-stub & Pakistan-squash-bio-stub as well, as the two covers greater number of squash stub articles. I don't know what's the rule here, but if the stub template does make sense, its fine with me Arteyu ?  Blame it on me !  02:59, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The template was created when sorting to decrease the usage of India-sport-bio-stub to aid the stub sorting process, which is why at the moment it's only India. I'm not opposed to anymore country specific templates either as it does help sort sportspeople categories, but this template should not be deleted simply because the others do not exist. Borgarde (talk) 04:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well defined, now only I understand why the stub should've existed at the first place. Arteyu ?  Blame it on me !  10:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.