Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/February/14


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

I've just created Latvia-church-stub as an upmerge to, pending the additional articles to warrant making it separate, but an editor from WP Latvia has created this cat straight away. Delete, until such time as there are 60+ Latvian church stubs. HeartofaDog (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete/upmerge unless it can be successfully filled to threshold with currently existing stubs. This is why upmerged templates should have some sort of commented-out text saying not to add a category - e.g., here. Grutness...wha?  23:08, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll put that on all of the new foo-church-stubs too - thanks.HeartofaDog (talk) 11:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, no reason to have a category that goes against the (guidelines? policy? whatever...) for category sizes. Nyttend (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.