Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/February/15

War-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed, and judging by the wording, the much-vaunted asbox is confusing even for long-established users. The idea of a isn't a bad one, though it would possibly be far better as a parent-only type for subcategories on specific wars. There's no sign that is oversized - and considering the undersorting in it, it should be much smaller. There's no sign that this split is particularly useful. Grutness...wha?  00:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - good-faith creation, but the Military history stub already serves this purpose. Outsider80 (talk) 03:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wars usually involve a military or two right? Term war is objective (one person may define a battle or skirmish what another would define as a war) Valley2 city ‽ 07:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Waronterror-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

As above, and with the same meaningless wording. The category and articles seem confused as wether the correct title of this campaing in "War on Terror" or "War on Terrorism", but either way, if needed, the template needs to match it, capital T and all. The template may be useful, and the idea of renaming (and losing the current name) makes some sense. To whichever name, though, depends on a CFD which I'm about to launch. Grutness...wha?  00:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - meaningless (due to its ambiguity) political phrase used by the last U.S. presidency & already abandoned by the present. If such a stub is actually needed (if there are actually enough stubs to fill it), a better wording could be found. Outsider80 (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete additionally it doesn't even mention "War on Terror" in the stub, instead "This War article about War is a stub". That could be ANY war, not just the WoT. Valley2 city ‽ 07:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.