Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/February/6

Child-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

I discovered the category in uncategorized categories and listed it at WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2009/February. Grutness noted multiple problems with it: I figure you folks will know what to do with it.--Stepheng3 (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Never proposed
 * Uses deprecated "Foo-related stubs" name format
 * Vague/ambiguous/overlapping scope
 * Delete per my earlier comments at WSS/D. Only used twice in ten months, and no clear reason for it to exist. The disparty between the two stubs using it gives some indication of the problem: one's a medical condition and the other's an social workers' union. Is this stub type for children? Children's health? Education? Developmental psychology? Social welfare? Most of the things that could use this are already well-established parts of the stub tree. Note: If the consensus is to keep, the category will need renaming from the "Foo-related" form, and some stub and permcat aprents will be needed. Grutness...wha?  00:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Further comment - I've just realised that I actually noted this one as a discovery some time back - the comments I made at the time about possible new proposals still hold. Grutness...wha?  00:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.