Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/January/14


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was withdrawn nom - keep

The template has existed quite happily for a year and a half and has garnered nearly 20 articles in that time. Today, someone decided - without proposal and despite the fact that 60 is the required minimum - that there were enough stubs to de-upmerge the template and create a new category. Delete category and re-upmerge template. Grutness...wha?  01:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I've been hoping someone would find enough items to give this its own category. There are now 61 items and a sub-cat; please may we keep? Her Pegship  (tis herself) 20:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wheee. 0 to 20 in 18 months, 20 to 60 in a few hours. OK, seems like someone's decided to work backwards and make a category then fill itl rather than populating the template then proposing a new category. In that case, a keep looks far more sensible. Grutness...wha?  23:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Translink-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was del per nom

Incorrectly named, unproposed, redlinked template for stub articles relating to TransLink (South East Queensland). - a subject which has no dedicated permcat and which, judging by the article's whatlinkshere (and removing all the - already properly stubbed stations), is going to struggle mightily to get to the required threshold. Note:In the unlikely even of this being kept, it will need moving to a more apprporiate name, such as TransLinkQLD-stub, given that the company is not called Translink and Translink is a dab page. Delete. Grutness...wha?  01:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep i would like to see this stub type kept so it can be used to easily sorted articles that are stubs as part of Translink mattythebatty (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC) ps.sorry for not proposing
 * Delete As per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Translink. SEO75  [  talk  ]  12:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Other related categories to Rail and Buses can easily sort this. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 00:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

no what i mean is other projects have stubs linked to them like wikiproject brisbane and australia mattman (talk) 07:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * keep help catorgize with the new wikiproject about translink and keep the existing catorgies aswell to make it easy to stub the articles about translink 144.131.194.66 (talk) 10:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC) — 144.131.194.66 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  i could also just implement this template to be housed off wikiproject page mattman (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC) sory for forgeting to log on
 * No you couldn't - it's a stub template., They're not part of wikiprojects, they're for use across the entirety of Wikipedia. BTW, please don't !vote twice. Grutness...wha?  23:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Those projects may use the Australia-stub & related templates, but they were created independently of their projects. If they create their own talk-page banners, that's independent of the stub-sorting project. Delete as related to project space, not article space. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 21:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

this is what i mean to have that stub for that type of stub for the translink seq articles also another coment is that the rail and bus stubs are too general as it covers the whole of australia not just queensland or southeast queensland mattman (talk) 23:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.