Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/January/25

/

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy rename sexuality stubs

I hate reopening closed debates, but this time it seems to be necessary... A debate on renaming occurred here on December 29th, which resulted in the consensus of "rename". Unfortunately, by my reading of the discussion, the consensus was a rename to, and the category got renamed. Either point out that I'm wrong or rename correctly this time :) Grutness...wha?  23:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Years-stub /

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Unproposed, but may be a useful type. if kept, though, both the template and the category need renaming, since they should be singular, not plural (Year-stub / ). Rename, but don't keep the current name as a redirect. Grutness...wha?  00:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I created the stub and I don't mind what it's called as long as it's meaningful to the WP:YEARS project so go ahead and rename it. It's plural because the project's name is plural.  I have to say that this is all very pedantic and I don't particularly like the tone of the message on my talk page.  --Orrelly Man (talk) 17:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi there Orrelly - the message on your talk page is a boilerplate notification message and nothing personal was meant. If it sounds pedantic, well, that's kind of the nature of stub sorting - unglamorous but necessary! Thanks for your participation, and I suggest we rename per nom & creator. Her Pegship  (tis herself) 19:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Given that Orrelly Man has given assent to a renaming, and the project probably wants to start using this, could this perhaps be speedied? (I can't win this week - now I'm getting complaints for using a boilerplate message :( Grutness...wha?  23:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Battery-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Unproposed, and frankly unlikely to see much use, if any. Malformed, with no category link, edit link, or link to WP:STUB. Delete unlesss some significant use can be demonstrated. Grutness...wha?  00:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

&rarr;

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

This one's a straightforward one, at least. They do have buildings in the UAE, so we shouldn't have missed them out when the category was named :) Grutness...wha?  00:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I just came here to propose this one. rename to fit in with other similar categories. Waacstats (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.