Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/June/25

Japan-food-stub and

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename.

Would it be OK if I moved this stub template to Japan-cuisine-stub and have it record stubs to ? This would be to bring their naming structure into line with the other national cuisine related stub templates and categories. This is part of a housekeeping move for the WP:Food project in regards to our naming guidelines. --Jeremy (blah blah) 05:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable to me -it would also allow for a wider scope (covering drink and other cuisine-related topics). Support. Grutness...wha?  08:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with renaming as both stub templates (one as a redirect) already exist and the wording in the stub itself already reflects the coverage of both food and drink (it uses the word "cuisine"). I don't think the Japan-food-stub template should be deleted, but instead made into a redirect (basically switching how it is now). And for the record, Jeremy, I didn't create this stub. I only created a category for it to dump into due to how many articles were tagged with it. Accusing me of not proposing the stub before creating it is disingenuous since I didn't create it in the first place. Incidentally, it was actually proposed before creation, as seen here (both food and cuisine). ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been bold and moved the stub and corrected the category as I don't see any reason why anyone would object. It may take a few hours for the category to reflect the change since the server has to catch up with where the template is pointing now. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I posted the note on your talk page because the creator of the template is no longer active, but you were a major contributor. I informed you using the template provided on the SfD page. I believe you misunderstood the intent behind the template I used, it was only the boilerplate template that is on the SfD page. It was not an accusation of any misanthropy or incompetence; please read through to the end of it and you will see a disclaimer stating such: This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. I am sorry if it upset you. --Jeremy (blah blah) 18:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Generally, for long time users, it's best not to use templated messages. You can also edit templated messages once posted to reflect actuality (I've done that many times myself). No worries. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.