Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/March/18

Grisons -> Graubünden

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename


 * Rename: Category:Grisons geography stubs to Category:Graubünden geography stubs
 * Rename: Grisons-geo-stub to Graubünden-geo-stub, leaving a redirect behind
 * The category Category:Grisons was recently renamed Category:Graubünden in conformity with the main article, which is at Graubünden. These should be renamed accordingly. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support all, might be an idea to have a redirect at Graubunden-geo-stub aswell. Waacstats (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - It is harder to write Graubünden than Grisons. The Rolling Camel (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * True, but unless you can talk the place into changing its name, that's hardly a valid reason for having Grisons as the main name here. You'll still be able to use a redirect if one's left at Grisons-geo-stub - it's just that the template and category will conform to the official name. Grutness...wha?  22:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, Support. The Rolling Camel (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support all, no reason to have a stub out of line with its topic. Nyttend (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Stub:Theology

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

Incorrectly named template, we already have Theology-stub. Waacstats (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Misnamed, redundant, duplicate. Grutness...wha?  22:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Grutness and nom. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 23:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

TAMU-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was ''' keep and upmerge. Mairi (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)'''

Feeds into a non stub category. We don't normally split by universities and when we do we don't usually split bios by which university the person went to. Waacstats (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment:We have similar discussion on deletion of a university related template over here. Oldag07 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - the stub templates shouldn't be that specific. Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 23:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and upmerge into Category:Texas university stubs as per Template:TexasTech-stub. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.