Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/October/1

Hamburg-small and redirects

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Appears to be a misguided attempt to create a "not-quite-a-stub template". Unused - as are its redirects at Hamburg-geo-small and Hamburg--small (!). Unneeded - either something is a stub or it isn't, and if it isn't it uses expand. I really, really doubt anyone would think it was a good idea to create a parallel system to the stub system to sort articles which aren't quite stubs. If there's enough interest in grading all hamburg articles, a talk page assessmrent template is a much more sensible option. Delete. Grutness...wha?  23:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not used, redundant to article sorting by class via Hamburg task force on talk page. Sebastian scha. (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Sebastian. Waacstats (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.