Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/September/10

&rarr;

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 

Rename, to match all other subcategories of. Grutness...wha?  10:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support for consistency. Waacstats (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support renaming for consistency with not only the other subcategories, but the main category. Mm40 (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Livonia-stub/Livonia-geo-stub/

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete

Given the number of unsubcategorised, splitting off regions seems a poor option. It could be seen as a good move with, since that is getting close to the golden number of 800 stubs, but if we were to split it, then Livonia would not be a prime candidate for a split. Latvia's administrative reguions are a bit difficult, since they've recently changed from five regions divided into 26 districts and 7 cities, but this year they changed to 109 municipalities. But even if we used the old Historical regions of Latvia (which are too vague to use easily) we wouldn't be considering Livonia as a major split. I suggest deleting these and considering a proposal to split the geo-stubs either into the five regions, 33 districts/cities, or 109 municipalities. Each of the nominated templates was only used on one article, BTW. Grutness...wha?  12:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * delete as too vague a region Waacstats (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:KwaZulu Natal geography stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename


 * Moved from WP:CFD
 * Propose renaming Category:KwaZulu Natal geography stubs to Category:KwaZulu-Natal geography stubs
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename. Should be renamed for consistency with KwaZulu-Natal and other related articles and categories. snigbrook (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * rename per nom. Grutness...wha?  22:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * '''Rename per article and perm category. Waacstats (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.