Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/September/27

/MB-manufac-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 

Replaced by /cycle-manufacturer-stub - replacement and re-organization according to discussion. Stub template and category has no longer any articles. --Kslotte (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per discussion at WP:WSS/D Grutness...wha?  22:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete was already discussed. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous discussion. Waacstats (talk) 13:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Australia-botanical-garden-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to Australia-garden-stub, delete redirect

A peculiar case, this one. Rosiestep correctly proposes Botanical-garden-stub and Arboretum-stub, then creates both and this national variety less than a day into the discussion of them (there are both support and oppose comments at the discussion on the generic types, and other alternatives have been suggested). Given that (a) there's no decision yet on the generic types; (b) no discussion at all on by-nation types; (c) a good possibility that if they are approved they will be with different names; (d) no indication that by-nation types are even needed for such a generic stub type; and (e) no clear indication of whether both botanical gardens and botanic gardens should be covered by this (they are not always identical), I feel that this should be deleted. Grutness...wha?  22:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; not enough of them. Hesperian 06:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


 * After discussion at WP:WSS/P, I'm changing this nomination to rename to Australia-garden-stub, but without keeping the current name as a redirect. Grutness...wha?  00:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.