Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/December/24

GreatBritain-botanist-stub / Category:British botanist stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. — ξ xplicit  12:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

There already is UK-botanist-stub and Category:United Kingdom botanist stubs, so I don't see any reason for this sub type and I think it should be deleted. Svick (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No point in having an incorrectly-named duplicate. Grutness...wha?  21:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ayeyarwady-geo-stub / Category:Ayeyarwady Division geography stubs and Mandalay-geo-stub}} / Category:Mandalay Division geography stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename

Rename from "X Division" to "X Region" per recent renaming of Burmese subdivisions. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:39, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * See also Category:Sagaing Region geography stubs —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:42, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.