Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/December/7

2007-song-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Propose deletion. Not used. And as far as I'm aware, we categorize by decades, not individual years. Dawynn (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed, we do split by decade. This doesn't seem particularly useful...delete. Grutness...wha?  21:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge all to —  ξ xplicit  12:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

was split into its various districts without any proposal. I have taken the time to review all of the articles in Gujarat-geo-stub and India-geo-stub and verify that all had a more distinct home, if possible (to the best of my ability). Still, none of the districts meets the 60 article criteria. The following list of categories have 20 or less articles. I propose that all of these categories be deleted, until more articles can be found to justify their existence. The associated templates should be kept, but should upmerge to. This will add 256 articles back to. Dawynn (talk) 11:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * (18 P)
 * (14 P)
 * (10 P)
 * (16 P)
 * (15 P)
 * (6 P)
 * (3 P)
 * (11 P)
 * (20 P)
 * (18 P)
 * (12 P)
 * (5 P)
 * (20 P)
 * (8 P)
 * (7 P)
 * (10 P)
 * (13 P)
 * (14 P)
 * (13 P)
 * (5 P)
 * (18 P)
 * Upmerge per nom. Been thinking about nominating these myself for a while, but wasn't keen on trying to populate them first - good work on the attempt, Dawynn! Grutness...wha?  21:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per nom - Yay, someone else working on the India stubs! Dana boomer (talk) 23:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.