Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/June/11

stub-sun / Category:Sun stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete both. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Original template is malnamed and the creator did not properly fill out the asbox template (an error I have since corrected). Category does not use any of the project templates. None of this has been approved. Only one article in category. I'm recommeding deleting both the template and the category, and moving the article to or. Someone more versed in the field may be able to suggest a better placement for this article.

If the original creator wishes to keep this category, I'd suggest renaming the template to sun-stub, placing the category under and filling the category with a good number of articles (60 or more). Dawynn (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Done I agree to Dawynn's preposition for renaming the stub. Sun is very important and there is many unwritten articles about it which may be stubs in beginning. I will do as he said.  Alex discussion 14:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.