Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/November/15

Category:Stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Withdrawn. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Rename to - other stub categories aren't child categories of this one, so most stubs aren't in the deep content of this category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose rename: I don't see the problem. Other stub categories are indeed logically child categories of this (well, I suppose they are, though fortunately their listing is suppressed on the main category page), just as "British politicians" is a child of the unsorted "Politicians" and "British people" categories. If the top level stub categories were all listed on the main category page, this would just slow down the process of looking at that page to stub-sort.  And I am proud to announce that I have just emptied the category, in defiance of the template's instruction: "Please do not empty the category or remove this notice while the discussion is in progress."! PamD (talk) 11:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * While I can see the point, I'm not entirely sure it would make much sense - perhaps it would be make more sense to simply make and/or  a subcat of . It's important that the main stub category doesn't get swamped with the full list of cats that's in  for ease of maintenance - but perhaps it does need to be linked into the tree. Grutness...wha?  22:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.