Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/November/16

Template:Selonia-geo-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - completely malformed, used only on a single article, weird categorization. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Already adequately covered by zemgale-geo-stub, which is well below the required level for a split. Grutness...wha?  23:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sciuridae stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename. --RL0919 (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I think that /Sciuridae-stub should be renamed to /squirrel-stub to match permcat name, Category:Squirrels, and use the common name in stead of the scientific name for these familiar rodents. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Rename I was going to propose this for the reasons above, at the same time as changing the text. &mdash;innotata 18:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brachiopod stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No consensus. --RL0919 (talk) 17:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Upmerge - Underpopulated, permcat contains only 57 articles. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Comment - looking at the list of brachiopod genera, the underlying problem seems to be a lack of editors interested in writing about brachiopods, rather than a lack of brachiopods to write about. J. Spencer (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Comment it also looks like not all brachiopod articles are properly categorised, and certainly not all the stubs. &mdash;innotata 19:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.