Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/November/25

Catalonia stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Upmerge per nom. Ruslik_ Zero 20:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Upmerge the three templates currently residing in Category:Catalan building and structure stubs to Category:Catalonia stubs and delete the category. The three templates are Catalonia-struct-stub, Catalonia-university-stub and Catalonia-museum-stub. The building and structure cat is at 34 stubs - far undersized - and this will bring the main cat to around 230 articles.
 * Upmerge the templates for the four sub-cats of Category:Catalonia people stubs and delete the sub-cats. The sub-cats are Category:Catalan artist stubs, Category:Catalan politician stubs, Category:Catalan writer stubs and Category:Catalan sportspeople stubs. All four are far undersized and will bring the people stubs cat to around 100 articles. Dana boomer (talk) 01:12, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * In both cases, upmerging should be to both the larger Catalan category and to the equivalent Spanish category (e.g., Catalonia-struct-stub to both and ). Other than that, I agree - these don't yet need separate categories. Grutness...wha?  05:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:BDSM biography stubs/BDSM-bio-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Upmerge per nom. Ruslik_ Zero 20:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

This category is quite small (14 pages) and can easily be upmerged into its parent category (Category:BDSM stubs), making the parent category only around 80 articles. Dana boomer (talk) 02:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Central Illinois geography stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Upmerge per nom. Ruslik_ Zero 20:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Upmerge the three templates that make up Category:Champaign-Urbana geography stubs, the two that make up Category:Charleston-Mattoon geography stubs and the two that make up Category:Galesburg MSA geography stubs into the parent cat of Category:Central Illinois geography stubs and delete the cats. The three cats together make up only 34 articles, which will raise the parent cat to around 350. Dana boomer (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Harrisburg area road stubs/Har-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete both. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Delete this improperly named template and very tiny category. The single article can easily be recategorized by adding the template, which would add it to the proper category. Dana boomer (talk) 02:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Category is unnecessary; template is both unnecessary and pretty horribly named, as a quick glance at Har will testify. Grutness...wha?  05:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Dough 48  72  02:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this was for a WikiProject that I believe is now defunct. --Rschen7754 02:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete the previous wikiproject was merged into the PA project.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete stub template of a once WikiProject, later task force that no longer exists. –  T M F 03:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Warhammer stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Upmerge both'''. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Upmerge the templates for Category:Warhammer 40,000 stubs and Category:Warhammer Fantasy stubs to the main category Category:Wargame stubs and delete the categories. The two subcats are very small and will bring the main cat to less than 150 articles. Dana boomer (talk) 23:28, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Windmill stubs/windmill-stub/Netherlands-windmill-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Upmerge. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

These two templates should be upmerged into the main category Category:Building and structure stubs and the category they make up deleted. The templates are on only three articles together, so the category is far undersized. Dana boomer (talk) 23:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Upmerge - catscan can only find a few more which would help populate it - nowhere near 60. Grutness...wha?  09:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.