Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/November/27


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Wrong forum - moved to WP:CFD

Not necessary category. There is no categories for every federal state in the USA. This category appears only in Texas Open (tennis)-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's nbot a stub category, it's a permanent category, so it should be listed at WP:CFD. I've moved it there. Grutness...wha?  22:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

&rarr;

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename to "...arts..."

More accurate and more inclusive title (mentioned after the fact over at WP:WSS/P). Possibly speediable, since I'm the only editor of this category, but I'm running it through here just in case. It would also be worth moving the template from art-documentary-film-stub to arts-documentary-film-stub (currently a redirect) and deleting the original name, to allow for the possibility of a future art-specific type. Grutness...wha?  04:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I was the one who had first raised this, and I certainly support. Renaming to arts will bring it into line with parent category, Category:Documentary films about the arts. Also, we have no "art" category in Category:Documentary films by topic, we go by "arts" for the broadest use of term, and then Category:Documentary films about the visual arts for films on what I think you mean by "art." thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * True, though (as an artist and arts reviewer by profession) I've never been truly happy with the term "visual arts", which is why I tend to avoid it. Performance art and multi-media art are often counted as visual arts even though they have big auditory content, for instance. But that;'s not a discussion for here. If we needed a subtype, then would be the likely name, though we'd probably want to use art-documentary film-stub for the template. Grutness...wha?  22:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.