Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/October/18


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete both. Any stub which could fit into here should be tagged as child-book-stub. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

This was discovered in July of 2006 with over 50 articles. It now has no articles, and the main category only boasts 12 articles, with very few of these (if any) truly classifiable as stubs. I could see possibly keeping the template, Goosebumps-stub, but the articles and template should be classified under parent category. Dawynn (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Support deletion of category and template as unused. Waacstats (talk) 08:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.