Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/October/21

Template:ClevelandNeighborhood

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete and retag with CuyahogaOH-geo-stub. Jafeluv (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Misnamed, only 11 uses, unproposed, no permcat for pages which would get this template (see Category:Cleveland, Ohio. I think it should be deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * These stubs can be classified alongside other geography stubs in the same county. Upmerge to CuyahogaOH-geo-stub. - Eureka Lott 13:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Except that the template you suggested is named correctly, and represents a permcat (Category:Greater Cleveland). This one is neither. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't often participate at SFD, so please forgive me if I misuse the terminology. I was merely suggesting that the nominated template could be replaced with the appropriate county template instead of a straight deletion. If the lack of a permcat is the primary concern, would Category:Neighborhoods in Cleveland, Ohio be an appropriate parent? - Eureka Lott 19:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No - that's not a stub category, just as the template is not - by name at least - a stub template (though that is clearly its intent). All stub templates should conform to standard stub naming, as should all stub categories, and new stub types (i.e., category/template combinations, or either singly) should be discussed prior to their creation to ensure that they fit in with the wider scheme of stub types and also follows the standard naming for stub types. This one quite clearly does not in any way fit that scheme or pattern. If there were sufficient stubs for a stub template for Cleveland to be worthhile, it would be at ClevelandOH-geo-stub, and would cater for not just neighborhoods but for all geographic features in Cleveland (e.g, parks, plazas, creeks). I'd have no objection to such a styub types being proposed, but currently the Cuyahoga one does that job pretty effectively. As such, my !vote would be to delete and retag the articles with the CuyahogaOH-geo-stub. Grutness...wha?  09:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete and retag per Grutness. Dana boomer (talk) 15:15, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.