Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/October/24

Category:Artemis Fowl stubs/Template:ArtemisFowl-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete both. Ruslik_ Zero 19:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Very small cat, very unlikely to get any bigger. Propose placing articles in proper parent cats and deleting. Dana boomer (talk) 23:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This one has a long, intriguing history. The original template (the badly-namked AFStub) was deleted, along with the category, in April 2006. It was quickly re-created (with a still-poor template name of Artemis Fowl-stub) by a group of A.F. fans, and gained 30 stubs for its re-created category. Despite this being severely undersized, it was kept when nominated for deletion in December 2006, partly by number of comments and partly by way of a WikiProject devoted to the subject (albeit a fairly inactive one). It appears as though the number of stubs has dropped to the point where even a Wikiproject would be hard pressed to say how it is more effective than a "to do" list on a project subpage... Delete. Grutness...wha?  09:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anglican cathedral stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Created by a now-blocked new user. No template associated with this category - all eight articles in it have been added by directly adding the category to the page and all are still in the parent Anglican church stub cat. A little over 300 articles in the parent cat, and current properly uploaded cat is by country (US). By the way, this subcat (the US one) could probably be separated onto its own, as it has over 100 articles in it. Dana boomer (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Tarheelz123 is not a blocked user. But you're right that this is not the way a stub category should be made, and we don't currently split churchees up by type of building (denomination, yes; cathedral/church/chapel, no). It's been depopulated, BTW. Delete, unless anyone wants to propose that we start splitting them that way...? Grutness...wha?  09:48, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I know this is off topic, but how is he not a blocked user? Popups says he's blocked, his userpage is tagged as being blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and when you try to edit his talk page it says he was blocked on 27 September 2009 for copyright vios. Am I really missing something here? Dana boomer (talk) 11:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ack - my fault. When checking the block logs I entered his name as blocker, not as blockee. No wonder nothing showed up. You're right, he's blocked. Grutness...wha?  23:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.