Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/April/1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was upmerge

Propose delete category, upmerge template. Permcat only has about 20 articles. Dawynn (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * support delete and rename. Waacstats (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was combine categories into new archbishop category; make relevant extra template

Propose deletion of category, upmerge of template. I have reviewed all of the articles in permcat. Most of these are lengthy articles. I only found 20 that could be considered "stubs", and some of these were pushing the boundaries. Dawynn (talk) 12:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest merging this and the similarly undersized into a new . It'll still be undersized, but not nearly as badly so as the two current categories. Grutness...wha?  20:38, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sure with the addition of a ChurchofEngland-archbishop-stub it wouldn't be undersized for very long. Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Copenhagen Metro-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was rename

Copenhagen Metro-stub - unproposed but I sorted and found 20 articles to make it borderline viable - but needs rename to Copenhagen-metro-stub. SeveroTC 07:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Rename  per nom - and delete current name. Grutness...wha?  10:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.