Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/April/23


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Rename per nom. Ruslik_ Zero 17:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Propose renaming to to fit in with over 100 other stub cats. Waacstats (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * S'port - change per nom. Grutness...wha? 


 * Rename to match everything else in . Pretty straightforward. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Red-dwarf-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moot. Red-dwarf-stub was speedily deleted under WP:CSD, and reddwarf-star-stub has been created in its place. (non-admin closure) A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Inappropriately named template. While I have no doubt that a template for red dwarf stars would be useful, this is not a subtype of dwarf-stub, it is a subtype of star-stub, and should be named correspondingly as reddwarf-star-stub, as pointed out during its proposal ai WP:WSS/P, and per other similar subtypes of star-stub. Rename, and delete the current unused name. Grutness...wha?  23:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment the main article is called Red dwarf. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 10:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment why "reddwarf-star-stub" instead of "red-dwarf-star-stub"? Dwarf star is an article as well. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The main article may be red dwarf, but - as with all similar types - it is a subtype of star-stub and should be listed as such. As to why reddwarf rather than red-dwarf, we don't have a separate type for dwarf stars overall, which is what red-dwarf-star-stub would imply. Each hyphen indicates a level of hierarchy, as explained at WP:WSS/NC. If we needed and had a separate dwarf-star-stub, then using the extra hyphen would make sense, but there's no indication currently that one is needed, and certainly one has never been proposed. Grutness...wha?  21:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.