Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/April/4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was upmerge

Propose delete category, upmerge template. Only 21 articles in the permcat and its subcategories. Dawynn (talk) 15:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Doubtful: Perhaps the category could be upmerged to Category:British election stubs, but Great Britain as a country does not belong to the same era as the United Kingdom. So long as UK templates and categories use the term "UK" instead of "British", GB alternatives will be needed. Moonraker2 (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Categories can't be upmerged. The template can be kept, with its 'GB' name for all I care (others may have different opinions).  And I would be willing to hear advice as to where best to upmerge, but the current category is greatly undersized.  Can we upmerge the template to ?


 * Just so we don't discriminate, I'm willing to add (10 P) to the deletion nomination.  I would suggest upmerging the template to  in this case also.  But I'm open to other upmerge suggestions.  Dawynn (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * P.S. I'm wondering if there is a syntax misunderstanding here.  Please see above for definition of upmerge. Dawynn (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't have a view on deleting, Northern Ireland is at least part of the United Kingdom, but the Kingdom of Great Britain isn't. However, you said "The template can be kept, with its 'GB' name for all I care", and I suppose if we agree on that then that meets my objection, thank you. Moonraker2 (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Support nominator. Which is also to say I support Moonraker2's identical "opposing" idea. Keep the N.I. one as is for now, but it needs to grow to be viable and may need revisiting soon. Grutness...wha?  22:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

NorthAm-footyclub-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete template

Propose delete. We now have templates for the US, Canada, Mexico, all Cental American nations (with a Central America sub-category), and a Caribbean subcategory with its own template along with several Caribbean national templates. I will propose a template for Greenland on the proposal page. I don't think that the North American template is needed anymore. I propose deleting it, and turning the category into a parent-only category. Dawynn (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.