Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/August/21

Template:US-transport-company-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep as is for uniformity reasons. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  06:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

I propose renaming it to US-transportation-company-stub, per ENGVAR (fo the US we use "Transportation", not "Transport"), and permanently keep the redirect to make stub sorters' job easier. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * -transport- is used generically for all nations, in the same way that, say, -theatre- is — uniformity makes it easier because of the way asbox is set up to deal with these as being subtypes of a more generic name (transport-company-stub). No objection to a redirect from US-transportation-company-stub, but the template proper should probably stay where it is. Since template names are "hidden" anyway, it sdoesn't make much difference as long as the category name agrees with the permcat. Grutness...wha?  10:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vietnam-war-stub &rarr; VietnamWar-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was rename, keep current name as redirect

Simple rename - and the current name could possibly be kept as a redirect. We don't have a war-stub for this to be a subtype of (it was rolled into mil-hist-stub and deleted long ago), and it's the Vietnam War, not the Vietnam war, so the lower case in inappropriate. Grutness...wha?  01:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.