Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/December/11

→

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC) – עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Rename: Nonstandard naming: all other by country history stub cats use adjective form of country name; this one, approved last month without discussing the actual name, doesn't follow suit. SeveroTC 17:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nuclide-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC) – עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Not approved, but created anyway. As per proposals page, not needed as split from isotope-stub, not clear in scope and without permanent category. Currently unused. SeveroTC 13:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; recently created and essentially redundant to isotope-stub. 28bytes (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep It already exists in the article Fluorine-18. --3.14159265358pi (talk) 23:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, not quite: you added it to Fluorine-18 (having failed to win support for it on the proposals page) and it was reverted almost immediately. Even if it were used there, we can't justify the use of a stub template in just one article. SeveroTC 13:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment why not just redirect it to isotope-stub ? 76.65.128.198 (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Because it's not clear in scope and doesn't follow a permanent category. SeveroTC 13:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per same reasoning I used in opposing its creation: "I'm not seeing any use-case for this that is not met already by isotope-stub. Creating a fork of a small cat into one with a non-distinct meaning apart from the other one does not benefit wikipedia readers or editors." DMacks (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and per DMacks. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.