Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/February/7

Hotel stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was renamed/moved/deleted per extended discussions on related Feb. 8 stub types

A couple of subcats of were speedied without time for there to be any comments on naming issues. Given that the rest of the tree uses the form "Hotel (structure) stubs", it would make sense for the new tcategories to do likewise, especially since the alternative is both coumbersome and still ambiguous about whether it's the buildings or the companies. As such, I suggest the following renames: Grutness...wha?  22:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * &rarr;
 * &rarr;
 * Sorry for getting jumpy on that. I was following the pattern of the perm cats for the country categories.  I have no real preference either way and will follow the community's decision on this. Dawynn (talk) 10:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Given that we are splitting between company and buildings I think we need structure in the title, but given the recent moves would this not be and . Waacstats 13:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Or even "British...", yeah, that would be just as good. I was simply going by the "of/in the Foo" permcat => "Foo stubs" approach. Grutness...wha?  21:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. I thought the purpose of the UK -> British and US -> American moves was to make the stub categories fall more in line with the perm cats.  Here the perm cats are  and .  Frankly, given the hub-bub that 'structure' has caused for these categories, I'm willing to take 'structure' out of all the titles, as long as we don't start lumping the companies and structures back together (thus making things impossible to sort).  Do we need to change all of the new categories?
 * to
 * delete, as it was never approved and doesn't have enough articles to justify it.
 * to
 * - leave as is to align with permcat
 * to
 * - leave as is to align with permcat
 * I want to keep -hotel-struct- in the template title just so that taggers think about whether the article is about a structure or a company. Dawynn (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think anyone's suggesting changing the templates. The standard way of aligning a stub cat name with a permcat name is this:
 * &rarr;
 * &rarr;
 * Using a form like leads to category names which are not only cumbersome but also often misleading. Grutness...wha?  21:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * See February 8 for ongoing discussion about whether to delineate between structures and companies, or whether to create -hotel-stub templates. Dawynn (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Given the shift in direction from the Feb 8 discussions, I created:
 * Dawynn (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
 * Dawynn (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Washington (U.S. state) stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Rename all per the renames of similar categories on CfD.--Mike Selinker (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC) Per this discussion resulting in Category:Washington (U.S. state) being renamed to Category:Washington (state). All non-stub subcategories will be renamed (eventually) via CFD (see e.g., here) or CFDS. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) stubs to Category:Washington (state) stubs
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) radio station stubs to Category:Washington (state) radio station stubs
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) building and structure stubs to Category:Washington (state) building and structure stubs
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) geography stubs to Category:Washington (state) geography stubs
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) politician stubs to Category:Washington (state) politician stubs
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) road stubs to Category:Washington (state) road stubs
 * Category:Washington (U.S. state) school stubs to Category:Washington (state) school stubs
 * Category:Washington (U. S. state) protected area stubs to Category:Washington (state) protected area stubs
 * Support based on related moves. Waacstats 13:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Support per recent move. --  Admr Boltz  21:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.