Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/January/25

SouthAm-writer-stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, redirect

I just cleared out this template, and would prefer not to see it used again. This is another of the continent-level templates that has since been replaced by individual upmerged country-level templates. Propose deletion. Dawynn (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Another option would be to simply make this a redirect to writer-stub. Certainly the category should be parent-only. Grutness...wha?  21:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * An amicable solution. I turned this into a redirect for now. Dawynn (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Undersized Gastropod stub categories

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Propose upmerging the following categories to the next higher taxa. Note, I have several requests also on the proposal page, so "the next higher taxa" may change by the time these are ready to upmerge. Each of these are pretty well maxed, based on the main parent category. Unless new articles are created soon, I don't see potential for them to grow. Propose upmerging until we see a surge in article creation. Dawynn (talk) 17:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 *  (19 P)
 *  (8 P)
 *  (35 P)
 *  (25 P)
 *  (27 P)
 *  (29 P)
 *  (25 P)
 *  (27 P)
 * Support upmerger to whereever is thought best by those in the know. Waacstats (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.