Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/July/22


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge as undersized. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Propose deleting category, upmerging template. 14 articles in stub cat. Only 36 articles in perm cat, but many are beyond stub size. A conservative review of all articles did not turn up any additional stubs. Dawynn (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose: It's a useful category for expanding articles. Don't delete.--Sanya3 (talk) 10:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support - the stubs can easily be upmerged into the parent (which is also woefully undersized - in fact the whole Ukrainian musician tree needs work). No way this can currently reach threshold. Grutness...wha?  05:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support: In general the categories are for users to see similar articles, and I think that looking at the stubs doesn't give any examples of good articles for that category.Divide et Impera (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was refactor per nom

I was filling in the stub list when I ran across this anomaly. The title does not specifically say 'Christian', so this could be open to other faiths. So, without a proper review, it cannot simply be placed under, with the American and British categories. On the other hand, the title does specify clergy, so it is not as open as just a 'religious biography' category (see ). However, this makes Canada the only country to carry a non-faith-specific 'clergy' category.

I propose: Dawynn (talk) 03:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Building  with Canada-reli-bio-stub.
 * 2) Renaming this category to  and the template to Canada-Christian-clergy-stub.
 * 3) A review of all of the articles here.  Any non-Christian clergy should be moved out to the reli-bio category for now.
 * 4) A review of the articles and subcategories in  for help to fill in the reli-bio category.


 * Support. Sounds a reasonable solution. At a quick glacne they seem overwhelmingly Christian, BTW - though the odd one or two may prove tricky. Looks like there may be enough to also consider a Canada-bishop-stub. Grutness...wha?  00:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.